Language
is a fun but convoluted thing. For example: emotions are real things that
affect our lives, but when it comes to putting what one feels into words (even just words thought rather than spoken aloud
or written out), it’s not always easy to thoroughly and accurately describe
those feelings.
If
we can’t even use words to explain these things to ourselves, it’s no wonder
that we have difficulties communicating with each other! Luckily in most cases
we can rely not just on words, but also on gesture, inflection, tone of voice,
facial expression, to explain what our words mean.
What
also helps is if we’re talking to a friend or family member or coworker who
knows us, and therefore can fill in the gaps or “autocorrect” any mistakes in
speech or writing that we might make. This is why, when at a loss for the right
word, we can say to them, “Oh, you know what I mean!” and assume that yes, they
do know, or at least can make an
educated guess.
So
reading, in addition to being symbols made of lines and dots on paper and
screen to be deciphered into words, assigns the additional task to the reader
of interpreting the words into actual meaning. It’s communication without the
safety net of hearing the writer’s voice or seeing their face or gestures.
Sometimes the reader has no knowledge of the writer at all, and so can’t
interpret sincerity from irony with any real confidence.
Reading Is Not Like
a Puzzle
The
problem is that readers often take this first concept to an unwarranted
extreme. All the sentences are picked through with a fine-toothed comb, reading
between the lines is given more credulity than reading the lines themselves,
and words are interpreted with the modern rather than the contemporary
definitions in mind.
A
reader raised in the culture of today can’t help but interpret things through a
modern lens. But to take issues that are “hot topics” today and impose them on
innocent books written long before these issues were brought up is willful
misunderstanding. Besides that, the results of some of those “modern lens interpretations”
can be just plain silly.
A
friend from college, a classmate in many a literature course, harbors an odd
distaste for one of my favorite poets, T.S. Eliot. I once forced her to read The Waste Land, and to her credit gave
the poem a fair shot. When she put it down, however, her verdict was one of
confusion:
“So,
it’s about global warming?”
Now,
The Waste Land lends itself to many
interpretations. Anyone would be hard-pressed to tack it down to one specific
theme or meaning. But my friend’s interpretation was one that was born more out
postmodern Millennialism than the Lost Generation.
Not
every piece of literature is so vague. We don’t interpret Winnie-the-Pooh as being about deforestation…at least, we shouldn’t. And if we allow that there
are some interpretations that are NOT valid, that means that, even if there are
several valid interpretations, there is one interpretation that is more valid
than all the rest, because it coincides most faithfully with the author’s
original intent.
Reading Is Like
a Puzzle, Again
The
task duty of a reader is to translate lines and dots into words and then
interpret those words into meaning.
Not just ANY meaning. This isn't Arts and Crafts, and we shouldn't cut-and-paste an author's words to mean what we want them to mean. (One probably shouldn't cut-and-paste words, anyway, since it makes one appear as if they're constructing a ransom note.)
Contemporary
issues are good to think about or discuss or read up on. But we are missing out
on so much if we simply read books and interpret them to fit our worldview. It is so much
easier—and in the long run, more edifying—to seek out the original meaning, to
truly allow the author to communicate their thoughts. Whether we agree with
them or not, hearing other points of view (even across the expanse of time and
culture) can only expand our perspective of the world and, hopefully, give us
wisdom that otherwise we might not be able to collect in our short lifetimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment