It seems almost natural today for Sherlock Holmes to be linked to science fiction. Holmes is such a real character, yet somehow he is real in any sort of iteration. There are many, many adaptations of books that I have merely to glance at, and my reaction is instantly: “No. Oh…no. That is no so-and-so.” I am hard to please with my adaptations.
Yet, as I said, Holmes seems to be an exception. (Watson?
Not so much….) I have seen probably a dozen or more actors or various “incarnations”
of the character, from Basil Rathbone to Benedict Cumberbatch, The Great
Mouse Detective to Sherlock Gnomes. Of course, some portrayals are better
than others. Most interpretations of the character emphasize certain Holmesian
characteristics unevenly; for instance, in the movies with Robert Downey, Jr.,
they highlight Holmes’ pugilistic talents (I remember hearing people complain, “Sherlock
Holmes doesn’t fight!”).
The fact remains that Holmes isn’t not most of these
interpretations. He’s a combination of all of them.









