Herman Wouk’s masterpiece The Caine Mutiny is a fictitious account of (guess what?) a mutiny aboard a minesweeper U.S.S. Caine in the Pacific during World War II. It could be regarded as war fiction, but really the main conflict of the novel is not so much physical as it is psychological, as one inexperienced “by-the-book” captain attempts to take control and earn the respect of a ragtag and undisciplined crew, only to have everything go horribly, horribly wrong.
The main character, Willie
Keith, and his whole coming-of-age transformation from a high-class, lazy momma’s
boy to a self-driven Navyman, is very much like Humphrey van Weyden and Harvey
Cheyne Jr. But really, Keith’s journey—and
his B-plot romance with the struggling singer May Wynn—is really secondary,
almost to the point of being superfluous to the plot.
Just like Ishmael is the narrator but not the protagonist
of Moby-Dick, Keith is the primary perspective, but the main character
and driving force of Wouk’s novel must be Captain Phillip Queeg, orbited by the
sardonic academic Keefer and the simple and good first officer Maryk. The main question the novel poses the reader
is: Is Queeg insane?
The crew, for their part, is not at all helpful in
putting Queeg at ease in his new position of authority. They resent his new rules (which are actually
the Navy’s rules, just observed to their most extreme extent), call him names
behind his back, respond to his overtures of friendliness with cold silence,
and in no way try to get to know him or reassure him with respect. It’s immediately obvious that Queeg lacks not
only Keefer’s wit and sense of humor, but also Maryk’s common sense and
experience at sea, yet they—the natural leaders of the story, and Queeg’s main
connection to his men—make no attempt to bridge that gap.
The result is that Queeg’s nervous tendencies take
over. Not having been all that exemplary
an officer to start with, he becomes much, much worse. He becomes paranoid, fearful, a coward in
battle, a tyrant over petty matters, a liar always blaming others for his
mistakes and always taking credit for the accomplishments of others. His doubt becomes masked in vanity, his
depression leads to him drinking and isolation, and because he trusts no one,
no one trusts him. And because of his
erratic actions, the crew begins to suspect he’s gone crazy.
Now, even today, the word “crazy” has become
oversaturated in our vocabulary. We use
it to mean excited, to love something so much, to be annoyed, or to be
momentarily irrational…the list of nuances goes on. Of course in the back of our minds we know it
means “insane,” as in no longer in control of one’s mental faculties. So when the crew of the Caine begin to call Queeg “crazy,” it’s probably meant in a lighter
version, such as he’s unreasonable or eccentric or just plain unpleasant to be
around. It’s easy enough to stick a
label on someone you don’t like, even if that label doesn’t quite fit.
Soon enough, though, the word “crazy” takes on its true
meaning to the crew, particularly Keefer and Maryk. Keefer, with all his education and his
particular dislike of Queeg, decides to do some amateur psychoanalyzing of why
Queeg is such a weak, petulant leader. Maryk, who is so straightforward he takes this psychoanalyzing
literally, immediately takes this diagnosis to heart and begins to watch his
captain’s every move for more evidence. He logs every minor mistake Queeg makes, until a major disaster is
imminent and Maryk usurps Queeg’s authority.
The rest of the book involves the court-martial of Maryk
and all the officers who followed his leadership. This is where the question, “Is Queeg Insane?”
is tested from every angle. Wouk keeps
the answer ambiguous, allowing the reader to come to their own
conclusions.
When I read this book, I don’t read it from the
standpoint of a member of the Navy. I
read it from the only perspective I understand personally, and that’s from a
management perspective. I feel like
anyone in business, retail, or where one supervisor is supposed to delegate
tasks and dictate precedents, should read this book. Look at Queeg as a sort of “what not to do”
model, while also seeing how one should treat authorities so that they are able
to perform to the best of their potential.
No comments:
Post a Comment